The Vanishing Galician Lexicon and How It Lingers in the Diaspora

When I moved to Ukraine, I had to learn a whole new Ukrainian vocabulary. It turned out that I had grown up speaking a Galician/diasporan Ukrainian, which used many dialectisms, Polonisms, and archaisms. To keep track of the differences between the two lexicons, as well as to document the way my family spoke, I started to put together a dictionary.

I ended up with a rather comprehensive list, and as I know many other families in the Ukrainian diaspora use a similar lexicon to the one I grew up with, I decided to make it public. Ultimately, it’s an attempt to help preserve the western Ukrainian dialect that is still spoken in North America, but which is slowly being lost.

This of course is not the first project to make a dictionary of words from various Ukrainian dialects. There have been many lists of Lviv or Galician words published online, such as this one, as well as books such as Gvara, and a recently published comprehensive 800+-page dictionary called Лексикон Львівський. The latter (pictured) has many of the words in my list, but not all. Thus I feel there is still a lack of a similar project for the diasporan language.

The Galician Dialect

For historical reasons, a distinct dialect of the Ukrainian language emerged in Galicia. Since Ukrainians in Galicia lived in close proximity to Polish-speakers and the Polish language—there were many intermarriages, the official and dominant language in towns and cities was Polish, etc.—the Galician dialect has many similarities to the Polish language. Furthermore, Galicia, as opposed to much of the rest of Ukraine, was never part of the Russian Empire and so Ukrainians in Galicia had fewer restrictions on their language and less Russian influence. Once Galicia joined the rest of Ukraine in the Soviet Union, however, the language there too started to change, due to Russification, standardization, and the natural evolution of language.

The Ukrainian Diaspora

On the other hand, the Galician dialect, including its lexicon, accent, and orthography, was rather well preserved in the diaspora.

Several factors contributed to this, including:

  • The high concentration of Galician Ukrainian immigrants in many diaspora communities;
  • The rather static evolution of the language in the diaspora and its retention of certain archaic words, especially those related to technology (for example, “загасити світло” (“extinguish the light”), which harks back to a time when fire was used for lighting, or the word “перо,” which implies a “quill pen”);
  • The absence of the Russification of the language in the diaspora.

To clarify, when I use the word “diaspora” here I mean specifically the community that descended from the third wave of immigration (1940s-1950s), many of which came from western Ukraine, in particular Galicia. Though as the two prior waves of immigration also originated in western Ukraine (Galicia, Bukovina, Subcarpathia), the older Ukrainian communities probably spoke (and speak) quite similarly. However, it was the members of the third wave who eventually came to dominate community life in several regions of North America, especially in cities like Chicago.

I grew up in the Ukrainian community in Chicago, where many of the Ukrainian organizations such as Ridna Shkola, Plast and SUM, used a language/dialect similar to the way my family spoke. Thus even if someone had ancestors from central or eastern Ukraine, they were likely exposed to the Galician language if they were involved in the community. In fact, my paternal grandmother was from central Ukrainian and came from a Russian-speaking family, but her husband was from the Boyko region of the Carpathians and so for the most part she picked up the western Ukrainian dialect.

Galicia Today

Some of the “diaspora” words can be heard today in western Ukraine, but generally only in rural areas and from the older generations. Thus even in the region of the its origin, the dialect (especially heard from a young person) sounds rather archaic and old-fashioned to the average Ukrainian. While some of the words are in fact archaisms, most are just dialectisms (or even just original Ukrainian words) that were preserved in the diaspora but lost in Ukraine.

There are, however, a handful of these words that are used widely among all generations in Lviv and other Galician cities (for example, “ровер”). Other words are finding their way back to the modern Lviv language as there is a heightened interest in the old Lviv, the old language, and for example many new restaurants and cafes have chosen to use precisely these old Lviv/Galician words in their menus.

Comparison to Polish and Russian

For many of the words in my dictionary I added the Polish and Russian translations. Using this comparison, one can notice that a majority of the “diaspora” words are similar to Polish, and many of the “standard” Ukrainian words are similar to Russian. That said, by no means are all such cases Polonisms or Russisms, but one must keep in mind that Polish had a significant influence on the language spoken in western Ukraine, and that the Ukrainian language did undergo heavy Russification, which after WWII affected the language spoken in western Ukraine (and so there are a lot Russisms).

The book Contested Tongues: Language Politics and Cultural Correction in Ukraine by Laada Bilaniuk covers some specifics about the Russification of Ukrainian. A few examples can be found in this table:

Nonetheless, there are cases when the opposite is true—when the “diaspora” word is closer to both Polish and Russian than it is to standard Ukrainian (for example, “важне”), or closer to Russian than to Polish or standard Ukrainian. This may be explained by the fact that it is just an older Slavic word, as Andrew Sorokowski wrote in a comment under one of my previous posts: “some Old Galician words strike modern Ukrainians as russified, such as ‘vozdukh’ for ‘air’; there, however, are Old Church Slavonicisms, disseminated by the Greek-Catholic clergy in the 19th century.”

It’s also interesting to see when a word in one language has a completely different meaning in another (for example, “склеп”).

Thus, except for a few obvious cases, I cannot say when a word is a Russism, Polonism, or just an older Slavic word. In any case, I don’t want to prove any dialect or word is better or more authentic, but rather want to have a visual comparison of the languages.

Common Types of Changes

Some of the common changes to the “diaspora” language that I have come across in standard Ukrainian:

  • Feminine words have become masculine
  • є changed to e
  • ія changed to іa
  • ль, льо, ля changed to л, ло, ла, respectively
  • ґ changed to г
  • ф changed to п, хв, or х
  • и changed to i at the beginning and end of certain words

Some of these observations have to do with orthographic rules introduced in 1933, which aimed to Russify the Ukrainian language. The table below (from Iryna Farion’s Мовна Норма) outlines precisely some of these changes to the official Ukrainian orthography that was adopted several years earlier. The standardized Ukrainian 1929 orthography (the left-hand column), also known as Skrypnykivka, was continued to be used by Ukrainians in Galicia and the diaspora even after the 1933 orthographic reforms, but once Galicia fell under the Soviet Union after WWII, it too had to conform to the official orthographies. Thus only the diaspora has followed the Skrypnykivka rules, to a certain extent, until today.

The letter Ґ

Among the ways the Soviet orthography of 1933 aligned the two languages was by eliminated the letter “ґ” since it was an original feature of the Ukrainian language. And while this letter was resurrected in Ukraine in 1999, to this day it is rarely used in the country. On the other hand, the “ґ” was always used in the diaspora and so it can be found in many words, which in Ukraine are said with a “г” such as ґудзик, ґітара, ґазета, балаґан, ориґінально.

The letter Ф

The history of the usage of the letter “ф” in Ukrainian is quite interesting and quite complicated as well. According to Wikipedia, in Slavic languages the letter is used primarily in words of foreign origin (Greek, Latin, Germanic).

“The linguistic interventions included grammatical, morphological, and orthographic rules that were to make Ukrainian more similar to Russian and thus more ‘politically correct.’… The transliteration of words with Greek roots was changed to match the transliteration applied in Russian: for example, the transliteration of Greek theta was changed from “т” /t/ to “ф” /f/, as in the words анатема (anatema) which became анафема (anafema) ‘anathema’, and мит (myt) which was changed to міф (mif) ‘myth,'” (from Contested Tongues).

This made me wonder why if changing certain sounds to “f” was a way to Russify the language, then why the “f” was so widely used in Galicia before WWII, before Russification. I think this is explained by Polish and German influence on the language, as “f” is widely used in both these languages. (In Polish, it is probably due to German influence.)

Thus I am assuming the original Ukrainian words were:
“квасоля” not “фасоля” (from Greek via Latin “φάσηλος”/”phaseolus”)
“пляшка” not “фляшка” (from German “Flasche”)
“шухляда” not “шуфляда” (from Austrian German “Schubfach”)

These are the standard variations today in Ukraine, while the variations with “f” were common Galicia and are still common in the diaspora.

Though who knows, maybe when these things were introduced to western Ukraine, they immediately took the “f” variation.

I also once heard that the word “Хортиця” (the name of the island of the Zaporizhian Cossacks) roots from the Latin word fortis (strong) or rather maybe a variation of “fortress” or “fortification,” but the sound “kh” was used instead of “f” as it was more natural for Ukrainian.

Numerals 11 through 20

Finally, another notable difference is the the way numbers 11 through 20 are written (and accordingly, pronounced). In Galician Ukrainian these numbers used to be written “одинайцять,” “дванайцять,” etc., while today the standard spelling is with a “д” instead of a “й”: “одинадцять,” “дванадцять,” etc. The Galician spelling, for example, can be found in the Hand-book of the Ruthenian Language (Galician) published in Canada in 1905. I’ve had a difficult time switching to the “д” variation and so have stuck with the Galician pronunciation, which often elicits comments from friends in Ukraine who tell my I sound like their grandmothers when I say these numbers.

Other differences

A few more of my observations on the differences between “diaspora” language and standard Ukrainian:

  • in diaspora, more usage of -ові rather than -у in masculine dative declension
  • in diaspora, foreign words are more frequently declined, like names of cities “Чикаго,” “Торонто”
  • in diaspora, instrumental case less frequently used in certain contexts

The Diaspora Dictionary

All in all,  I have a compiled comprehensive list with nearly 600 words, which I made on Google Spreadsheets. For many words, I’ve also included the Polish and Russian translations, as well as a comment on the meaning or usage. The list can be sorted by category, part of speech, type of change, etc., which can used to find trends.

The “Diaspora” column is for the most part the way my family speaks. In most cases the words are common among the “diaspora,” but there may be some cases where specific words are only known/used by my family.

In the “Standard Ukrainian” column I tried to add the most accepted/standard word currently used in Ukraine, but sometimes I added a word that I hear the most, even if it may not officially be the most correct.

In addition to different words, I’ve also included words or phrases that are declined differently as well as differences in some common phrases and sayings.

There are of course cases where the standard Ukrainian word is known and used in the diaspora as well.

There may be some mistakes in the Polish and Russian columns, as I am not fluent in either. I had some help from friends, but also some help from Google Translate.

I welcome any corrections or comments, as all of the above are just my observations. I will continue to add to the list and make corrections.

For a link to the the full online dictionary, CLICK HERE

Postscript

In 2019 Ukraine adopted a new orthography, which brought back certain features of the 1929 orthography mentioned above. This, in turn, has made peculiarities of the “diaspora” language now accepted in Ukraine.

Below are some examples of rules that were introduced in Ukraine, which were always accepted in the diaspora:

  • Certain words that end with “і” can now be written with “и”; for example: незалежности, крови, любови
  • The dative masculine ending “-ові” has returned, which can now be used along with “-у”
  • Return of the spelling of “священик” to “священник”
  • Return of “є” in place of “е” in the words проєкт and проєкція
  • Usage of the letter “ґ” extended to toponyms and surnames: Ґорґани, Ґалаґан, Ґудзь
  • Return of the letter “т” in place of “ф” in certain words; for example: “етер,” “катедра,” “міт” (though the “ф” variation is still accepted: ефір, катедра, міф)

See also:

By Areta Kovalska

13 thoughts on “The Vanishing Galician Lexicon and How It Lingers in the Diaspora

  1. While I appreciate your work – for me it is more important that my grandchildren and great-grandchildren learn, speak and communicate among themselves in Ukrainian – Galician or any other accent is not important. I arrived in 1948 – do speak Ukrainian the way my grandparents spoke in Halychyna and the way my aunt and uncle (with whom I arrived in Canada) spoke and even taught in schools – because they were originally teachers in Ukraine. I am proud of the fact that my children and even great-grandchildren speak, write in Ukrainian and having attended 12 years of Ukr Saturday schools – know Ukrainian history and literature better than I, since my Ukrainian education was interrupted by Second World War. I know of many Ukrainian families of 4-th Waive Immigration – who say “why do our children need Ukrainian, they are living in Canada” – so their proper accent .does not seem to do any good at all. I do hope that our Galician Accent does not vanish but continues to linger in the Diaspora. I am proud of it – The pioneers with this Galician Accent built churches and Domivky, which the newcomers take for granted and in most cases do not contribute financially or culturally.

    1. I think it’s wonderful that even after so many decades and generations, Ukrainian is spoken by these families and that the Galician accent, dialect, and traditions have also persevered and I hope that they continue to do so

  2. Why do people assume that words which are “closer to Russian” are due to Russification? Ukrainian, Belarus and Russian are from the eastern slavic group of languages, and thus share many words; Polish is from the western group, so there would be less natural overlap with Ukrainian. And, if there is a question, an etymologic dictionary can help sort out word origins (whether the word has deep slavonic roots or is a loan word).

    Diasporan Ukrainian comes in multiple varieties, with many sources: Halychana (“Galician”), Volyn and environs, and “Velyka Ukraina” (eastern and central Ukraine) are three. Volyn, unlike other areas of west Ukraine, is predominantly orthodox and has been under Russian control (alternating with Polish); its vocabulary has western and eastern influences/words. There was Polonization, but less so than in Halychyna. (It was the language of my childhood.)

    A hallmark of the Galician diasporan dialect is a marked linguistic lisp–diasporan speakers pronounce the “c” (s) as a “sh” when followed by the softening sign or і, я, ю.

    1. I did note in my article that not all words which are closer to Russian are due to Russification: “In fact, it’s interesting to see cases where the opposite is true—where the “diaspora” word is closer to both Polish and Russian than it is to standard Ukrainian (for example, “важне”), or closer to Russian than to Polish or standard Ukrainian. This may be explained by the fact that it is just an older Slavic word, as Andrew Sorokowski wrote in a comment under one of my previous posts: “some Old Galician words strike modern Ukrainians as russified, such as ‘vozdukh’ for ‘air’; there, however, are Old Church Slavonicisms, disseminated by the Greek-Catholic clergy in the 19th century.””
      And I also noted that while of course Galicia is not the only source of the Ukrainian diaspora community, it did have a large influence on the community, and that in any case, my article is specifically about the Galician diaspora community (I didn’t have much contact with other communities so I am not addressing them, which I tried to make clear in my article.)
      I have also written about prononciation in the Galician diasporan dialect here: http://forgottengalicia.com/the-vanishing-galician-accent-and-how-it-lingers-in-the-diaspora/

  3. I wanted to add some words to the list.
    My dad always used балакати instead of говорити, and I can never find where this comes from. He also preferred the word гарбата instead of чай. I’ll have to do my own thinking about this. I’ve been upkeeping my Ukrainian with Duolingo and sometimes my vocabulary is so much different from what they’re teaching.

    1. Hi John, I hear the word балакати a lot in Lviv these days, it’s a colloquialism and I believe a dialectism, for as far as know it’s not used outside of western Ukraine. And interesting that your dad used гарбата for tea. That is from Polish, as “herbata” is “tea” in Polish.

  4. This is fascinating. Are there also phrases that are unique to the Lviv area? My family is from Rohatyn, SE of Livi, so I assume the dialect and word choice would be similar. Thanks!

    1. Yes, I think the dialect in Rohatyn would have been very similar. A lot of what is in the list would have been used across all of Galicia, but of course there were probably some small differences depending on what part of Galicia.

  5. Порекомендувала до друку Науково-методична рада НУ «Львівська політехніка»
    як навчальний посібник для студентів усіх спеціальностей
    (протокол № 34 від 15 березня 2018 р.).
    Ре ц е н з е н т и :
    І. П. Ющук — д-р філол. наук, проф., завідувач катедри слов’янської філології та загального мовознавства Київського міжнародного університету;
    І. М. Кочан — д-р філол. наук, проф., завідувачка катедри прикладного мовознавства Львівського національного університету ім. І. Франка;
    О. П. Левченко — д-р філол. наук, проф., завідувачка катедри прикладної лінгвістики, Інституту комп’ютерних наук та інформаційних технологій НУ «Львівська політехніка».
    Видано в авторовій редакції
    Зубков, Микола.
    Норми та культура української мови за оновленим правописом. Ділове мовлення. 3-й вид., доп. і змін. / Микола Зубков. — К. : Арій, 2020. — 608 с.
    ISВN 978-966-498-622-6.
    Посібник осягає основи культури спілкування, види й жанри публічних виступів. У ньому подано головніші правописні норми та правила, морфеміку й морфологію. Закцентовано увагу на особливостях уживання іменних і службових частин мови в офіційно-діловому стилі, а також на складних випадках перекладу науково-технічної, економічної та иншої термінології.
    Довідник допоможе зорієнтуватися у стильовому розмаїтті сучасної літературної мови, оскільки подає та характеризує всі її стилі й підстилі. Зручні таблиці містять класифікування документів і ділення їх за признакою та назвою. Уміщено чималу кількість формулярів-взірців сучасних документів і їхніх складників із докладним описом. Система запитанків і завданків для самоконтролювання надасть змогу охочим повторити викладений матеріял.
    Уперше в довіднику такого типу наведено низку посилок-виносок із пояснинами щодо призабутих, «зрепресованих», але природних для нашої мови термінних слів і словосполук, правила творення та вживання яких унормовує національний стандарт ДСТУ 3966:2009 й оновлений чинний правопис (2019).
    Книжка буде надійним порадником для всіх поціновувачів українського слова.
    Автор щиро завдячує членові науково-технічної комісії з питань термінології при Держстандарті України, начальнику відділу науково-технічної термінології Українського науково-дослідного інституту стандартизації, сертифікації та інформатики (1996–2006 рр.), к. т. н. В. Моргунюкові за редагування, плідне обговорювання рукопису й важливі зауваги, урахування яких дало змогу поліпшити зміст і вдосконалити наукову мову, відповідно до вимог національних стандартів ДСТУ 3966 і ДСТУ

  6. Incidentally, “The Bukovynian Lexicon” is rather similar to that of “Galician” except with more German rather than Polish (файно-fine vs. ладно). As far as Belarusian, Russian and Ukrainian being all Slavic languages and their similarities, they did not develop similarly. While Belarusian and Ukrainian languages were well on their way during X and XI Century, Russian language had its start in the XI Century with the introduction of religion, using Macedonian/Bulgarian church language that was used in liturgy, sermons and courts among the Hungro-Finish tribes of the North.

  7. Yes, herbata is tea in Polish, presumably from herb (tea), what is the origin of this ? classical?
    Chai – did that come the other way with Genghis? This part of the world is a crossroads!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *